The Search For Honest Men

Diogenes, the famous ancient Greek philosopher, engaged in a notable quest known as the “search for an honest man.”

Through this pursuit, he aimed to unveil the hypocrisy and superficiality inherent in societal norms and conventions. Diogenes employed a rather unconventional method of shedding light on people’s true nature and their adherence to deceptive practices that hindered authentic living.

In his endeavour, Diogenes would hold up a literal light, such as a lamp, to individuals’ faces during broad daylight.

This action symbolized his intention to illuminate the truth and expose the façade that people often wore in their interactions with others. By subjecting them to this direct scrutiny, he aimed to provoke introspection and self-reflection.

Diogenes believed that many individuals in society indulged in insincere behaviour, adhering to social norms and conventions without truly living in accordance with their own values. Through his actions, he sought to challenge and confront this hypocrisy.

By holding a light up to their faces, he intended to metaphorically expose the shadows and darkness that obscured their genuine selves.

By forcing people to confront their own participation in disingenuous practices, Diogenes aimed to encourage them to live more truthfully. He sought to disrupt the prevalent culture of pretence and reveal the stark contrast between societal expectations and genuine authenticity. #

In doing so, he hoped to inspire individuals to question the conventions that hindered their ability to lead honest lives.

Diogenes’ unconventional approach, marked by his commitment to living in accordance with his own principles, made him a distinctive figure in the philosophical landscape.

Through his search for an honest man and his symbolic act of holding up a light to people’s faces, he challenged the prevailing social order and called for a more genuine and sincere way of living.

  1. #LeadershipMatters
  2. #LeadWithIntegrity
  3. #EmpoweringLeaders
  4. #StoicPilgrimJourney
  5. #FindingInnerStrength
  6. #SustainableLiving
  7. #EnvironmentalResponsibility
  8. #EcoWarrior
  9. #SocialJusticeNow
  10. #EqualityForAll
  11. #InclusiveCommunities
  12. #StandUpForJustice
  13. #JusticeReform
  14. #FairnessMatters

Corporatocracy and Capitalism Aren’t Really Working, and People Are Finally Beginning to Realise…

Introduction

In recent years, an increasing number of individuals have started questioning the effectiveness of corporatocracy and capitalism as the dominant systems governing our societies. While capitalism has long been hailed as the driving force behind economic growth and innovation, the real driver was human curiosity. We didn’t need capitalism, humans love solving problems but when people start to ‘own stuff’, they revert to primate dominance behaviour. What capitalism had given us is significant social and economic disparities. Entrepreneurs who realise this but want to carry on winning regardless, are often heard remarking:

 “Don’t Hate the Player, Hate the Game”

But as people become more aware of the negative consequences of uncontrolled corporate power, there is a shifting public opinion taking place. Here are some reasons why corporatocracy and capitalism are facing scrutiny and explores the emerging awareness among people regarding the need for change.

The Illusion of Choice

One of the fundamental principles of capitalism is the idea of free-market competition and consumer choice. However, in reality, the concentration of power in the hands of a few large corporations has led to a lack of genuine competition and limited options for consumers. Many industries have become dominated by a handful of corporations that control prices, stifle innovation, and create barriers to entry for smaller competitors. As people observe this consolidation of power, they are starting to question the notion that capitalism fosters fair and equal opportunities for all.

Income Inequality and Exploitation

Capitalism, in its pursuit of maximizing profits, often results in income inequality and the exploitation of the workforce -see the children digging for cobalt for the EV market. The widening wealth gap between the ultra-rich and the rest of society has reached staggering proportions. CEOs and executives earn exorbitant salaries while workers struggle to make ends meet. Furthermore, globalization has enabled multinational corporations to exploit cheap labour in developing countries, perpetuating a cycle of poverty and inequality. As people witness these injustices, they are beginning to recognise the inherent flaws within the current system.

Environmental Impact

Corporatocracy, characterized by corporate influence over government policies, has also contributed to the environmental crisis we face today. Profit-driven companies often prioritise short-term gains over long-term sustainability. This mindset has led to the overconsumption of natural resources, pollution, and the exacerbation of climate change. With the increasing urgency of environmental issues, people are demanding accountability from corporations and seeking alternatives that prioritise the well-being of the planet.

Social Responsibility and Ethical Concerns

As information becomes more accessible, individuals are gaining insight into the unethical practices employed by most corporations. From labour rights violations and human rights abuses to tax avoidance and irresponsible marketing tactics, these actions have raised ethical concerns among consumers. People are now seeking businesses that align with their values, opting for ethical and socially responsible companies. This growing demand reflects a broader realisation that profit-driven motives must be balanced with ethical considerations for a sustainable and just society just as Adam Smith originally espoused.

The Rise of Alternative Models

The shortcomings of corporatocracy and capitalism have spurred the exploration of alternative economic and governance models. Concepts such as social entrepreneurship, cooperatives, and degrowth are gaining traction. These models prioritise social and environmental impact whilst striving for a more equitable and sustainable future. Moreover, the increasing popularity of movements like the sharing economy and the focus on circular economy principles demonstrate a shift towards alternative economic paradigms that value collaboration, resource efficiency, and social well-being. After all, we collaborated our way to the top of the evolutionary tree.

Conclusion

The realisation that corporatocracy and capitalism are not working for the betterment of society or the bio-sphere upon which all life depends, is gaining momentum. People are becoming increasingly aware of the negative consequences associated with unchecked corporate power, income inequality, environmental degradation, and unethical practices.

As a result, there is a growing demand for economic systems that prioritise fairness, sustainability, and social responsibility. The exploration of alternative models and the re-evaluation of our values are crucial steps towards reshaping our economic and social landscapes. It is through these endeavours that we can envision and create a more equitable and prosperous future for all.

We don’t need more conferences discussing it or reporters flying around the world to inform us, we know already. We need some rebels and mavericks to find and create new pathways for people to follow.

There’s some here: Rebels Chatting

#AlternativeEconomics #SustainableFuture #SocialResponsibility #EthicalBusiness #EnvironmentalCrisis #Sustainability #IncomeInequality #Corporatocracy #Capitalism #SocialInequality

We Need More Mr Joneses!

Are our biggest challenges hierarchy and cowardice?

I watched Agnieszka Holland’s powerful drama, ‘Mr Jones’, last night.

James Norton portrayed the real-life Welsh journalist who uncovered Stalin’s genocidal famine in Ukraine known as the Holodomor. Jones brought the tragic events happening in Ukraine to the world’s attention. Moreover, Jones persisted in his mission despite personal dangers which would ultimately see him meet an untimely death shortly before his 30th birthday in Mongolia, at the hands of Russian security agents.

The film is a specific account of Jones’s courageous journey to publish the truth of the Holodomor tragedy in Ukraine under Stalin before WWII.

But it’s a tragic story that is continuously inflicted on people by powerful elites in the pursuit of extreme ideology and development goals. The inaction of fearful sycophants and politicians desperately clinging to power, which emboldens the brutality of the wealthy Machiavellians, Sado-Narcissists and Psychopaths who invariably profit from our exploitation, misery and end up running our countries.

Furthermore, once the truth does come out post the event, the inertia to act on new insights ensures that lessons not only go unheeded but become a playbook for repeat occurrences elsewhere.

Following Stalin’s Holodomor in Ukraine, Hitler’s Nazi Hunger Plan was developed to systematically starve 30 million Ukrainians, Russians and Slavs so that the food surplus created from starving the communities, could be redirected to Nazi forces.

This plan, led by Nazi Food Minister Herbert Backe, was intended to open the fertile soils of Ukraine to German settlers post the conflict. History appears to be repeating itself. Tyrannical psychopaths and narcissistic vandals are often the frontmen, whilst the Machiavellian monsters orchestrate the atrocities from behind the scenes.

During Brexit, Dominic Cummings was masterful at influencing from the rear and ensured that a ‘divide and conquer’ tactic, used by many colonising villains historically, caused enough confusion to break up the EU.

It wasn’t about making an informed decision. It was about who was motivated enough to break the rules and what little democracy was left, in order to manipulate the results. The already rich and greedy trumped the day.

They’ve become so brazen that they don’t even hide it now because there are little consequences even if uncovered…. As long as you belong to one of the ‘in-crowds’.

Britain itself was fond of concentration camps during its colonial ambitions around the world.

It imprisoned around a sixth of the Boer population comprising of mainly women and children of which nearly 30,000 died along with an untold number of black people. During the Mau-Mau uprising in Kenya, members of the Kikuyu tribe were imprisoned and as a result many died from malnutrition and torture.

We could go on to talk about Native Indian resettlement in the USA, the war in Yemen sponsored and supported by Britain’s weapon manufacturers and military, or even the Palestinian situation.

There’s generally a lack of willingness to look at these situations by the mainstream, let alone accept and adapt into the future. Whenever threatened, the elites tend to double down on their tactics, i.e., more capitalism, more propaganda, more divide and conquer.

The establishment is afraid to face the truth about its colonial history because the same strategies are being used in a slightly different way today. Physical slavery is replaced with debt slavery. Nobody is free to do as they want in a capitalist world apart from the 1%. Even fairly smart but wealthy individuals are reluctant to challenge their own modus-operandi.

I’m interested in what people think will happen as we enter this era of existential challenge.

What can ordinary people do, if anything, to prevent themselves, their families and their communities being persecuted by tech-cap titans, wealthy weapons peddlers, aristocratic elites and power addicted politicians?

We’re supposed to be the custodians of the planet, due to our intelligence. Yet the severity of the atrocities inflicted on fellow human beings and the destruction of their own environmental life-support system, by nutcases in the name of warped ideologies, is not something observed in the wild as far as I know?

What happens when the delusions of national boundaries are realised as just another command-and-control mechanism and that the real boundaries are between the rich them and us?

History

Thanks to the work of anthropologists, we’ve learnt that our ancestors lived for 200,000 years, a mostly egalitarian hunter-gatherer lifestyle. If people did live in cities, inequality and exploitation were not a given. It seems we drifted into hierarchy. But anyway, back to what we believe now.

Our contemporary social systems and beliefs are built upon what happened around 10,000 years ago. The big transition is known as the agrarian revolution but really it was the beginning of the Tech-Cap era.

We’ve been stuck in re-branded versions of tech-capitalism ever since and its sole aim is to own everything and replace humans with tech, so as to increase production. This is so wealthy people can exploit more of the earth’s resources for less hassle. As more tech replaces humans, less and less homes and schools will be needed to house factory workers or hospitals to maintain their health.

Humanity has been widgetized and externalised.

Scientists might dream their work will one day benefit humanity and the bio-sphere. But wealthy elites always usurp and secure the use of new tech to gain even more wealth which doesn’t trickle anywhere but into their offshore accounts.

They know their game is up, it’s just a matter of jockeying for the last morsels and working out how to survive the collapse.

This all began with farming. It was then that people started competing for ownership of the land. Nutritional levels decreased and it also became hierarchical and warlike in Europe and elsewhere.

This then morphed into colonialism. National competition for dominance meant that over the last few centuries, power went from the Dutch with their navy to Britain, who replicated and overtook the Dutch navy with cheap labour, but who were eventually usurped by the Americans. But whichever country gained dominance, they all went exploring and exploiting other lands.

The two decades of war in the middle east was a massive pay day for the usual players and they’re not in the least bit bothered about terrorism. Terrorism and 911 were just tech-cap opportunities.

Incidentally, the contemporary San people of south west Africa, have been around for thousands of years and outlasted many dynasties and empires. It appears that cities and hierarchies come and go, whereas egalitarian hunter gatherers and nomads, if not exterminated by colonialism, fare much better longevity wise.

It’s All in Our Heads

According to Dr Iain McGilchrist it’s all down to the way we use our brain and we’re overly reliant on the left-side of our brains.

London cabbies, who having undertook ‘The Knowledge’ training – driving around London to learn all the routes – re-shape certain areas of their brains.

I bet that’s what’s happened to the left side of our brains. The left is concerned with ‘think-do’ to compete and control resources. It is ego-centric, likes predictable problems and can’t see the woods for the trees.

When it’s won the competition for wealth and power either through birth or being in the right place, with the right product, at the right time – lucky in other words – it then wants to control the resources so as to not have to share their wealth.

That’s why they keep developing new TAP’s-Tools to Accumulate Power. ChatGPT and other forms of AI are the next phase. It’s ‘think and do’ quicker. We’ve overly developed left-sided brains it would appear and the tech evolutions are external manifestations of our inner world.

The right side of the brain is more able to understand complex situations and can ‘sense and feel’ it’s way around ambiguous and novel situations. It’s more sociable and empathic. Ecological in other words.

But the rich and infamous don’t like tricky and transient problems. They can’t control ambiguous and novel challenges with capitalism, centralised solutions and hierarchy. So, they ignore them.

These are known in economics as ‘externalities. Whilst they plunder and exploit the earth and other people not in their ‘in-crowd’, they push the cost of all this onto societies.

And we are too afraid to do anything about it because they allow the rest of society just enough resources so that you won’t tell them to “Foxtrot Oscar!”

They pay the police enough to turn on their own people. They manipulate the narrative through the media to generate a divide and conquer situation. They have us running on hamster wheels too exhausted at the end of the day to do much else. They build gated mansions and pay their army of lawyers to stop people walking on the land they’ve snatched and they’re making it illegal to protest against them.

Our response…

So far, our response seems to be that similar to a fish in a fish bowl.

We’re swimming in a bowl which is filling up with trash. The owners are feeding us less and less. So, our response is to swim in the other direction whilst begging the hand that feeds us, to come back and clean up the mess.

And of course, they never come back or clean up, do they?

But that doesn’t stop people making a living trying to tell other people which way to swim. No, they want to appear saintly so make a living telling the exploited they’re being exploited by foreign invaders.

The Solution!

It would be an enormous task to outline a solution and not the work of a simple fella like myself. We collaborated our way to the top of the evolutionary tree. It’s going to take better decision making and powerful collaboration to survive, if’s it’s still possible.

I think there are three virtues that we need to instil in everyone first.

Adaptability- We need to become more experimental and get out of the goddam fish bowl.

Resilience- We’ll need resilience to keep operating in less-than-ideal circumstances over the long term

Courage- It’ll take the courage to act before pain motivates us into rash actions. We’ve got to realise that we are the heroes we’re looking for.

We have to accept that we and the planet are being exploited by the people we vote for. We have to see through their false dichotomies of left and right.

So stop voting!

We need to stop asking for permission and just get on with implementing experimental solutions. Progress will not be big leaps but one small step followed by another, with lots of back-sliding too.

How about not buying the next smart phone which relies on the exploitation of kids in the Congo?

How about learning to grow your own food?

How about building a community?

We need more Gareth Joneses in the world. Humble, curious and courageous.

Published by

🌍 Martin- 'Murph'-Murphy🌍
Eco-Leaders Academy- Egalitarian & Eco-friendly Leadership, Stoic Pilgrim Adaptability, Resilience & Courage & Super Team Concepts For a Transforming 🌎 Rebels Chatting – Podcast

Better Business Summit

When change agents don’t speak out because they’re scared the system will reject them, then there are no pioneers, rebels or mavericks… Just managers and enablers of the status-quo.

Fortunately 👩🏻‍💻Hannah Cox FRSA FRGS kicked off the The Better Business Network Summit which brought together courageous collaborators on a mission to transform the paradigm we’re living in.

It was a privilege being asked to be on a panel on Day 2 and then be co-leading the Freshwalks around the hills of Edale.

The Great Outdoors is an excellent arena for meeting, talking, being inspired, getting into ‘flow’ states and building resilience. it’s important to challenge ourselves often.

The stoics call it voluntary challenge, an essential activity for change agents, because they face mighty challenges. Challenging the status-quo is not for the feint hearted. it was an honour to spend a day out in the hills with this plucky community:)

#network #community #business
#change
#leadership
#mavericks
#rebels
#changeagents
#bethechange

Adam Smith, the grandfather of capitalism said:

“Concern for our own happiness (self interest) recommends to us the virtue of prudence (self-command), concern for that of other people, the virtues of justice and beneficence –- of which the one restrains us from hurting, the other prompts … (us) to promote that happiness.”

He didn’t intend for some people to become extremely wealthy at the expense of everyone else and everything else including nature.

Much like the stoic emperor Marcus Aurelius, Smith believed in the virtue of moderation because it threatens our social structure and the capacity for effective decision-making when you confuse wealth and power with wisdom.

Unfortunately, economists seem to have taken what benefits elites and ignored the warnings for excess.

How will business leaders operate in a future world which can no longer accept simplistic and short term thinking, decision-making and hierarchy?

#power #happiness #leadership #ecologycheck #decisionmaking #decisionmakingskills #complexity #future #business #superteamconcept

What Hunter Gatherers – ‘The First Affluent – Society’ Can Teach Us About Surviving a Changing World Order!

Ray Dalio the famous investor said it’s a good idea to look back into history to understand and predict the future. It’s an insightful talk (I’ll leave a link in the comments) in which Ray outlines the various changes to world orders that happen around every 250 years (not 500 as I say in the video) and if we want to stop the downfall of the west as China increases it’s power & influence, then we’d better be nice to each other and not spend as much as we earn!

I think whilst his analysis is excellent and solutions useful, it doesn’t take into account the evolutionary aspect of why the human race is heading towards an ecological collapse. It’s dominance hierarchy.

It seems that as soon as founders, entrepreneurs & managers get positions of status, wealth & power, then they switch-on their ‘Inner Chump’.

Your inner chump is competitive and controlling, harmful to the ecosystem, because it is driven by unconscious bias, motivated by fear & greed and paradigm blind and suffers inertia to change.

The hunter gatherers it appears, have the answer. They don’t stand for greedy indivduals because they understand the damage it does. Damage that’s all too plain to see in our leaders. Have a watch:

What are you going to Stop-Start-Recover & Adapt?

Scientific philosopher, Thomas Khune, stated that ‘advancement is not evolutionary, but rather a series of violent revolutions and in such revolutions one conceptual worldview is replaced by another’. Khune called these revolutions in worldviews ‘Paradigm Shifts’

As I was explaining the universal life cycle to a client yesterday, the pandemic was a useful example of the latest paradigm shift.  Every decade or so, we experience upheavals because shifts happen. As much as we’d like the world to be certain, it seems that the second law of thermodynamics regarding entropy of systems always comes to pass.

A shift is when the world as we understand it suddenly stops working and we go into some sort of emergency event. Examples of shifts I’ve experienced are 9/11, the Great Recession and now we’ve got Covid-19 and the fall-out from that in terms of second and third order effects are yet to be fully realised.

Right now, the pandemic has disrupted our lives and business behaviours but it is also an opportunity to create new beginnings. Winners of the present paradigm however, are not very good at accepting reality and adapting, especially when it comes to giving up power, status and wealth. So, it is vital that whilst the incumbents are wrestling to maintain the status-quo, that we get busy challenging, connecting dots and creating a brave new world.

There are three responses:

  • You can create some new ‘things’ to do.
  • You can stop doing some things.
  • You can recover and adapt whatever you were doing before.

However, in the recover and adapt stage, one has first to recognise and understand why something collapsed in the first place. Then work out what you need to do to make that ‘thing’ more resilient, valuable and sustainable.

Whilst we might not want to throw the baby out with the bathwater, it will be necessary to adapt otherwise you head into the realm of ‘lessons are repeated until they’re learnt’.

When that happens, the weak point will become more difficult to recover in the future. Moreover; lessons are repeated more often and cost more resources often leading to a slow death. How long organisations bounce up and down from collapse to recovery and back again, depends really on how much money they have to waste.

A better response if you don’t feel adaption is going to be beneficial is to indulge in some creative destruction, get rid of the old and create something new.

The DRIVE for Transformation

I’ve just been speaking to some friends who’re doing some changes in the way they operate their business. Well they’re not ‘just’ changes, they’re actually transforming the structure and the way they communicate with each other and their customers.

There are five stages to pass through and seven fears to overcome when making bold moves to make your world and everybody else’s, a better place to live and work. You’d think everybody would be up for the challenge, but that’s not usually the case. That’s why Tom Collins advises leaders in his book; ‘Good to Great’, that before you decide where your business bus is going, you need to:

‘get the right people on the bus, and sat in the right places’

 

Continue Reading  Here:

Attracting Top Talent with ELITE Magnetism

 

A challenge a lot of business leaders and entrepreneurs I work with face, is the ability to attract the calibre of people required for both peak performance and the successful growth of their business. In order to attract top talent, leaders must develop a culture which utilises what I define as: ELITE Magnetism. Read More:

Inspirational leaders, universal paradigm shifts and the art of smooth sailing

Paradigm ShiftsOrganisations are being born, growing, consolidating, sometimes evolving, sometimes collapsing and then recovering. Or they can die with the components being assimilated into other things. There are infinite possibilities but all are following a similar pattern, the universal life cycle.

It’s been said that an organisation’s greatest asset is its people. This may be true, but it takes an enlightened leader to guide those people. A leader needs to be able to recognise what reality is occurring in the moment and where the team are heading. Along the way there will be paradigm shifts. When the behaviours that led to success up to a particular point, will not get the team to the next level. Knowing what these paradigm shifts look like, helps leaders generate the appropriate message to inspire new behaviours.

Metaphors, stories and analogies are powerful tools in a leader’s repertoire. A relevant story told by an inspirational leader can cause an immediate shift in perspective and direction. Research by McKinsey suggests that telling meaningful stories which include various themes leads to higher engagement. It makes sense when presenting the case for change, to attend to the various personalities of the audience.

Four points to consider when preparing for a paradigm shift:

Rewards and recognition: Explain how individuals will benefit from successfully completing the new mission; should they choose to accept it.
Creativity and connectivity: Note the opportunity for the team to bond together and tap into the collective intelligence of the group to provide innovative solutions to tackle the challenges ahead.
Support and familiarity: With the possible stormy weather ahead, encourage everybody to support each other as a family unit.
Quality and focus: Encourage a quest for excellence pointing to the team’s ability to design the best products and services, redefining the beliefs about what is possible.

To make the story inspirational leaders should also include how the work will contribute to the larger world, what Simon Sinek refers to as the big ‘Why’. Revealing to the team which paradigm they’re shifting too and why the change of course is necessary, will give clarity of direction.

Here are some universal paradigms to consider:

Setting sail on a new adventure
This is the entrepreneurial stage when a leader may have to galvanise a small team to overcome the trepidation of setting sail on a new adventure. It could be the start of a new business or project, but like any new idea, it takes a lot of energy to create something worthwhile. It demands extraordinary courage, determination and resilience. It is the beginning of a heroic journey of which the spoils will go to the brave. As Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote:

“To reach a port we must sail, sometimes with the wind, and sometimes against it. But we must not drift or lie at anchor.”

Growing from good to great
If the entrepreneur survives the first stage of business creation, confidence increases as the product or service attracts an increasing client base. From here, the group needs to become cohesive, focussing on higher standards of aligned performance so that they can achieve greater levels of success. The leader has to help the expanding team programme themselves for success. Systems and training should be introduced to strengthen the performance and culture. A story of going from good to great inspires greater levels of determination as well as boosting pride and esprit de corp. As Jim Collins espoused:

“… it is very difficult to have a meaningful life without meaningful work. Perhaps, then, you might gain that rare tranquillity that comes from knowing that you’ve had a hand in creating something of intrinsic excellence that makes a contribution. Indeed, you might even gain that deepest of all satisfactions: knowing that your short time here on this earth has been well spent, and that it mattered.”

Too much of a good thing
Of course as organisations grow, they can become too hierarchical and bureaucratic. Work can become frustrating for the team and leader. It’s usually as a result of thinking that because systems worked at first, adding more will help. The reality is that satisfying the system, not the purpose of the organisation, becomes the overall aim. Now is the time to relax the systems and introduce some autonomy and entrepreneurial spirit back into the company. A leader aware of the universal life cycle will know it’s time for change as the resistance in a formerly successful companies grows. Think about the decline and fall of the Rome Empire. As Marcus Cicero pronounced:

“The enemy is within the gates; it is with our own luxury, our own folly, our own criminality that we have to contend.”

The butterfly effect
A strange thing happens when a caterpillar transforms. Cells within the caterpillar, known as imaginal cells, begin to resonate at a different frequency and act completely differently. Even though they are attacked by the immune system, the imaginal cells continue to proliferate. They then begin to cluster together into small friendly groups, sharing information. Eventually the clusters begin to join together inside what is now a chrysalis. It is believed that when the imaginal cells reach 10% of the whole, a tipping point occurs and the organism realises it is transforming. It gives birth to the Butterfly.

This analogy is a great one for leaders who want to guide an organisation to the next level of success. This is not a quick fix and relies on lots of little changes of beliefs and behaviours which build up over time. It is a time for deeper connection with customers to understand what they really want. Helping people collaborate and contribute more of themselves to the whole to enable something completely new to evolve. This paradigm shift occurs after the present business has reached a threshold point of growth and has to look for new ways to pivot the business. People may not realise the best is yet to come but as Buckminster Fuller wrote:

“There is nothing in a caterpillar that tells you it’s going to be a butterfly.”

                                                                                                                                                                                                   Leaning into the slope
Invariably shifts happen. System thresholds are reached, disruptive innovations appear on the horizon and increased competition arises. If an organisation is unprepared and the leader is unable to accept reality, the first line of defence is usually denial. The financial crisis was just such a story in the beginning.

At this point an enlightened leader knows that now is not the time to be shrinking back into a comfort zone. It’s time to face reality and rise up to the challenge. Those that did at the beginning of the latest recession, we’re more likely to weather the storm.

When a skier navigates down a tricky mountain pass, they realise that they must lean down the slope otherwise their skies will slide from beneath them. So too the fell runner traversing the rocky scree slopes and the boxer who’s opponent is advancing. You can’t lean away if you want to stay on your feet, you must advance if you want to survive. As Seth Godin informs us:

“Discomfort means you’re doing something that others were unlikely to do, because they’re hiding out in the comfortable zone.”

Discovering diamonds in the dirt and gold in the grit.
When an organisation is heading toward a systemic challenge, mental flexibility from the leader is essential. When the doo-doo has hit the fan, problem solving leaders know they must attend to various aspects all at once. But an enlightened leader will also encourage some of the team to look for the opportunities. There is always balance in the universe. For the Chinese, crisis and opportunity are represented by the same symbol.

Some great companies were formed during economic recessions. If Kodak had ‘leaned into the slope’, they might have realised the potential of digital photography which one of their own people had discovered. Even in the worst of times and in the darkest of places, you can find hidden gems. Of course you’ll miss them if you don’t programme the mind to look. As John F Kennedy encouraged:

“In a crisis, be aware of the danger but recognise the opportunity”

                                                                                                                                                                                                          Endings are the new beginnings
Some philosophers believe there is a whole other realm of potential from which we and everything that exists, all arise and return to. Endings are inevitable. Sometimes it is necessary for a leader to kill off a project, product, department, idea or even a business so that new ventures can grow. If Richard Branson hadn’t let his music business go, he probably wouldn’t have got the airline off the ground and with the later paradigm shifts in the music business, more than likely would have lost everything.

If a business closes, all the ideas, experiences and learning that was created, will move on to become part of something new elsewhere. Nothing in the universe is ever wasted. In the cycle of life, death plays an integral part. As Cheryl Strayed described:

“Most things will be okay eventually, but not everything will be. Sometimes you’ll put up a good fight and lose. Sometimes you’ll hold on really hard and realise there is no choice but to let go. Acceptance is a small, quiet room.”

The great turnaround
Once the reality of a collapse has been accepted by a leader it becomes time for the great turnaround talk. A time to galvanise everybody behind the recovery. It feels similar to the setting sail, entrepreneurial period. High risk inspires engagement, a clear vision and mission inspires boldness in the face of imminent disaster. There are many examples of businesses that have been able to claw their way back from the brink of death to become successful and profitable enterprises once again.

Apple, was at one stage on the brink of bankruptcy and borrowed funds from its nemesis Microsoft, to survive. It later became the most valuable company in the world. Fed-Ex’s boss Frederick Smith had to gamble his last $5000 in Las Vegas to pay off a fuel bill. Lots of companies go through desperate times and have had to take desperate measures to become great companies later on. Steve Maraboli explains that:

“Happiness is not the absence of problems it’s the ability to deal with them.”

Lessons are repeated until they’re learnt
It’s important for a leader to recognise what type of challenge they face and be able to design appropriate solutions. Of course in most instances, there is a temptation to plaster over the cracks. When a system has failed, patching up the system will still not allow you to overcome the systems previous limitations. Most people believe that humans are scared of change. That’s not quite correct, people make small adjustments continually so they can stay in the same place. But sometimes a fundamental transformation is required.

Of course a good way to recognise the lesson is for a leader to enquire if this type of thing has happened previously. Problems do and will return. Moreover; the same problems will become more frequent, will stay longer, be more painful and eventually lead to collapse. As Aldous Huxley wrote:

“That men do not learn from the lessons of history is the most important lesson of history”

Brave new world
As we’re on the Aldous Huxley theme, entering the brave new world is a necessary component of an evolving business. A lot of traditional businesses have had to evolve in order to survive the passage of time. Sometimes, one must experiment as if standing at the beginning of a corridor. So many doorways present themselves, but you have to step into the unknown to uncover the reality behind every door. That requires courage. All systems have an optimum state, they all reach a limit to growth and so bold leaders have to look for new ways of doing business and create new beginnings. As Peter Drucker realised:

“Whenever you see a successful business, someone once made a courageous decision”